For my blog post today about John McWhorter’s 2000 book, Losing the Race: Self-Sabotage in Black America,
 I will use as my starting point a story that McWhorter tells on page 
172.  The context is the controversy surrounding Proposition 209 in 
California, a measure that banned race-based admissions at public 
universities.  An anti-Proposition 209 organization at Berkeley was By 
Any Means Necessary, or BAMN.
“Indeed, it is difficult to avoid sensing at BAMN meetings, as well 
as in their literature and in conversations with their members, a yen 
for indignation rather than constructive engagement with the actual 
facts and positions surrounding university admissions and race.  Nothing
 indicated this more strongly than the organization’s treatment of a 
group committed to class-based, rather than race-based, admissions who 
tried to make a statement at one meeting.  The head repeatedly refused 
to allow the representative to speak, and when he finally managed to say
 his piece, predictably with a certain degree of exasperation at having 
been silenced for so long, she dismissed his position as ‘an attitude.’ 
 This group’s ideas were considered beyond the pale not on any logical 
basis, but because class, an inchoate concept in America, is less easily
 harnessed into personal, identity-based grievance, and is thus only 
fitfully commensurate with Victimology.”
Here are some thoughts:
1.  This passage coincides with other themes that McWhorter discusses
 in this book.  McWhorter criticizes a trend that he sees among 
African-American spokespeople that he believes is knee-jerk rather than 
intellectually rigorous.  In addition, as I talked about a couple of 
posts ago, McWhorter argues that most African-Americans are not poor.  
This influences his critique of affirmative action, for McWhorter points
 to statistics indicating that most African-American students admitted 
to Berkeley on the basis of race, under lower academic standards, are 
not from poor families.  Moreover, remember that scene in the West Wing
 in which President Bartlet’s conservative Supreme Court nominee, 
Christopher Mulready, is debating affirmative action with Charlie?  
Charlie is defending affirmative action by saying that African-Americans
 have been historically discriminated against, and Mulready responds 
that Charlie’s argumentation is stuck in the past, that Charlie should 
instead focus on the fact that minorities admitted to universities under
 affirmative action actually perform competently in academics once they 
get into college.  Charlie wants a paper and pen so he can write that 
down!  In any case, McWhorter would probably disagree with Mulready on 
this, for McWhorter argues that a number of African-American students 
who got into Berkeley due to affirmative action did not do particularly 
well in academics once they are in college.
2.  I have heard African-Americans who have said that Martin Luther 
King, Jr. later in his life fought classism, and they appear to praise 
him for that.  Why would BAMN not be open to someone saying that 
admissions should be based on class rather than race?  I can somewhat 
see McWhorter’s point (if I understand it correctly) that it may be 
harder to organize a movement against classism.  Moreover, there was 
probably a concern within BAMN that America could go back to the days 
when African-Americans were not adequately represented within certain 
fields, such as medicine and law, and that race-based admissions were 
necessary to keep this from happening.
I’m in favor of everyone having a shot at a good life, regardless of 
class or race.  I question whether having colleges admit people under 
lower standards is the way to go, however.  It’s not that I believe that
 only the cream of the crop or the best academic performers should have a
 shot at life, but rather that I think that people should develop 
competency.  The goal should be to ensure that everyone has an 
opportunity to do this before they apply to college.  Unfortunately, 
we’re arguably a long way off from having a level playing field, when it
 comes to education in America.