In my post today about W.A. Swanberg's Norman Thomas: The Last Idealist, I'll talk about Socialist Norman Thomas' views regarding President Franklin Roosevelt's New Deal.
This
will probably not be the last time that I discuss Norman Thomas' views
on the New Deal, since I'm still in the 1930's in my reading of this
book. On page 140, Swanberg narrates that Norman Thomas and Socialist
Morris Hillquit met with President Franklin Roosevelt in the White House
on March 14, 1933. Swanberg states that they "were greeted by
Roosevelt in a White House with a geniality not usually accorded
Socialists" (page 140). Roosevelt had just closed the banks,
which Thomas and Hillquit considered to be a bold and surprising move on
FDR's part. They encouraged Roosevelt to support a $12 billion bond
for relief and public works and to nationalize the banks that he had
just closed. Roosevelt paid attention to what they were saying, even
though he did not entirely agree with them. Thomas and Hillquit left
the meeting quite impressed with Roosevelt, and Thomas commented that
Roosevelt's program "far more nearly resembled the Socialist...than his
own [Democratic] platform" (Thomas' words, quoted on page 140). You may
recall that, during the 1932 Presidential election, Thomas did not
particularly care for Roosevelt's emphasis on the need for a balanced
federal budget.
But Thomas felt that, even though the New Deal was
coddling capitalism, it would not be able to revive it. Recovery was
slow, unemployment persisted, fascist mobs were in the street, and
charismatic leaders like Huey Long (whom Thomas publicly debated at one
point about Socialism) were gaining a following. There was fear that
fascism was coming to America, perhaps through "Wall Street brokers
plotting a right-wing military coup" (page 153). Thomas thought that
the New Deal would transition to something, but he hoped that
it would be Socialism, not Fascism or Communism. For Thomas, a
transition to Socialism would be much more peaceful. Thomas also did
not care for FDR's "big-navy program", or Assistant Secretary of War
Harry Woodring's idea of incorporating the Civilian Conservation Corps
into the army.
Thomas came to have problems with elements of the
New Deal. Let's start with the National Recovery Administration (NRA).
For reasons that Swanberg does not specify (at least in my reading up
to this point), Thomas regarded the NRA "as a potential back door to
Fascism" (Swanberg on page 158). Thomas also cited examples of "the way
in which minimum wages set by the [National Recovery Administration]
tend to become maximum" (Thomas' words, quoted on page 158). Then there
was the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA). Thomas opposed how
the AAA curtailed crops and livestock in a time when people were
starving, believing that it was an attempt "to save capitalism at the
expense of the poor" (Swanberg on page 158). According to Swanberg, the
AAA mandated that plantation owners share a certain amount of the
"plow-under payments" (Swanberg's words) that they received with their
sharecroppers, yet the plantation owners were the ones who were
administering the program at a local level. As a result, a number of
sharecroppers, who did not know to what the law entitled them, never
received their portion of the plow-under payments, and many of them were
fired because less cotton was being planted due to the AAA, which meant
that there wasn't as much work for the sharecroppers to do.