I'm actually writing this post on February 26, 2013. I've just
returned from Indiana, where I was attending my sister's wedding and
visiting with family. The Internet connection was not that good where I
was staying (most of the time) in Indiana, and so I decided to postpone
my blogging to when I would return to my home in upstate New York.
Plus, I needed a bit of a break from blogging! During my time in
Indiana, I still did my reading for My Year (or More) of Nixon. I read
volume 1 of Richard Nixon's memoirs, which goes from Nixon's birth
through his Presidency in 1971. The copyright for the memoirs is 1978,
which was four years after Richard Nixon resigned from office. I read
300 pages during the car ride to Indiana----and it was a good book for
car ride reading, on account of Nixon's clarity, pleasant conversational
style, and stories. Then, during the eight days that I was in Indiana, I
followed my usual practice of reading 30 pages a day. I finished the
book on the car ride back to New York.
The book is 669 pages, and I
don't think that I've ever covered the entirety of a book that long in
one post. I have a list of topics to cover, but I may not go through
them all. Rather, I'll make some points. Some of them will get into the
nitty-gritty, whereas others will focus more on the forest rather than
the trees.
1. As in Six Crises, Nixon in his memoirs
comes across as a basically decent person. Nixon admires goodness in
others and is fair-minded. He empathizes with people, even political
opponents and those he did not particularly get along with. He is
compassionate towards the disadvantaged. He has had a long-standing
love for peace and an admiration for pacifists (even though he admits
that he's not a pacifist), and he has seen the horrors of war. He
recognizes mistakes that he has made in the past. And yet, it was
noteworthy to me that Nixon in volume 1 of his memoirs sometimes
appeared to be rather shady, or he sought to justify activities within
his administration that many considered shady, as opposed to flat-out
denying that accusations had merit, as was the case in Six Crises.
For
example, Nixon talks about his 1968 campaign for President, when
President Lyndon Johnson was about to suspend his bombing for the
Vietnam War. Nixon was receiving inside information about Johnson's
policies from Henry Kissinger, who (in some capacity) was advising
Johnson at the time. Nixon was all for suspending bombing, as long as
North Vietnam met certain conditions, such as ceasing its aggression.
But what astounded me was that Nixon in his memoirs was quite up-front
in narrating his concern about how Johnson's move would impact Nixon's
campaign. That just looked devious to me. I mean, shouldn't a
statesman be rooting for the President to succeed in bringing forth
peace, rather than thinking about how a certain policy would affect his
(the statesman's) political future? Nixon often portrays himself as one
who was concerned about the good of others rather than himself. That's
why his narration of how he handled LBJ's Vietnam policy in 1968 stood
out to me like a sore thumb.
In some cases, Nixon's justifications
for certain shady practices struck me as poor, even if they were
understandable. For example, Nixon says that he supported dirty tricks
in campaigns because the Democrats themselves engaged in dirty tricks,
and he wanted the Republicans to fight back. That's understandable, but
"they did it first" or "they do it too" (not that Nixon uses those
exact words) sounds rather childish to me. One justification that Nixon
offered seemed to me to contradict another position that he holds.
Nixon, for example, expresses support for intelligence people stretching
the law in order to fight domestic terrorists, such as the Black
Panthers and the Weathermen, and he cautions that following the exact
letter of the law is not always wise because the authors of the law
could not have foreseen every circumstance that might come up. That's a
valid point. And yet, Nixon emphasizes the value of appointing strict
constructionists to the judiciary. Perhaps Nixon's justifications that
made most sense to me concerned his attempts to keep a lid on leaks.
Nixon talked about how leaks to the press about his foreign policy plans
had the effect of disrupting those plans, since it's not prudent to let
the people with whom one will be dealing to know everything one has in
mind; moreover, according to Nixon, the Pentagon Papers contained some
sensitive information, such as the names of sources of information to the U.S.
Good points. It's ironic, though, that Nixon criticizes leaks, when
elsewhere in his book he acknowledges that Kissinger was his source
within the LBJ administration. But it's still a fairly decent point.
2.
In reading the first volume of Nixon's memoirs, I thought about
previous books that I had read about Nixon. First, regarding Nixon's
run for the U.S. House against Democratic incumbent Jerry Voorhis,
Stephen Ambrose essentially argued that Nixon was unfair to say that
Voorhis had the support of NC-PAC (a group that was believed to have
been infiltrated by Communists) in 1946, for Voorhis had NC-PAC's
support in 1944 but not in 1946, when Voorhis had a reputation for
having anti-Communist beliefs on foreign policy (see here).
Nixon in his memoirs, however, says that the Los Angeles branch of
NC-PAC indicated in 1946 its support for Voorhis, and Nixon said that
this branch had a lot of Communists. Nixon's issue was that Voorhis (in
Nixon's eyes) was not sensitive to the problem of Communist
infiltration. Ambrose said that Nixon tended to misremember places, as
when Nixon said that a fried-chicken lunch with Senator Joseph McCarthy
and other officials occurred in Nixon's own office, when it actually
took place in Senator Everett Dirksen's office (see here);
on page 174 of the first volume of his memoirs, however, Nixon says
that the fried chicken lunch occurred in Dirksen's office.
Recently,
I've been reading psychological profiles of Nixon (one by Bruce Mazlish
and another by Eli Chesen), which assert that Nixon was not open to
pursuing in-depth self-examination. In reading his memoirs, did I find
Nixon to be one who speculated about how early events in his life shaped
the sort of person that he became? Occasionally. Nixon said that his
father was argumentative and that his father's fights with Nixon's
brothers made Nixon want peace. Nixon also stated that his mother's
low-profile religiosity----which focused on doing good rather than
wearing religion on one's sleeve----made him adverse to wearing his
religion on his sleeve. But I didn't see anything about Nixon's earlier
experiences in life making him an insecure perfectionist who sought
control, which was the picture I got from the psychological profiles
that I read. Nixon even mentioned the incident of him falling out of a
buggy at a very young age, but he did not comment about how that shaped
the way that he turned out.
3. There were a lot of interesting
discussions about public policy in volume 1 of Nixon's memoirs, ranging
from such topics as the Vietnam War, to welfare, to civil rights. (And
I'm still scratching my head about Nixon's discussion of civil rights,
for Nixon brags about how more schools became racially desegregated under
his administration, while also making the bizarre argument that Brown
vs. the Board of Education had no problem with segregated schools, just
so long as they were equal, which was one reason that he opposed busing
while supporting more federal support for education.) For this item, however, I'd like to highlight something that stood out to me on page 640:
"The
budget I submitted in January of 1971 was set to be balanced at full
employment and run a deficit to help take up the slack when unemployment
was high."
Nixon appeared to be walking a fine line. Inflation
was a problem during his administration, and he attributes that (at
least in part) to the heavy government spending under the LBJ
Presidency, as LBJ increased government spending for both the Vietnam
War and also the Great Society, running a deficit in the process. At
the same time, Nixon acknowledges that unemployment was rather high
under his Presidency, and Nixon seems to be aware that austerity
(clamping down on spending) is not that good on the economy when
unemployment is a problem. Nixon does not mention Keynes in the first
volume of his memoirs, but he may very well have had a Keynesian notion
that the government needs to spend money to stimulate the economy.
Overall,
on the issue of the Great Society, it seems to me from Nixon's memoirs
that he was for the government spending money to alleviate poverty, but
he did not care for how welfare split up families, and he wanted for
there to be work requirements or job training for poor families who
(under his proposal) would receive a stipend. He also thought that
George McGovern's proposal that every family of four receive $6,500 a
year went way too far!