I've been sick today, and so I've been too tired to write a post 
about last night's election results.  I feel a little better at the 
present moment, so I'll write my post now, but it will be a fairly light
 post rather than an in-depth discussion.
I
 was happy about four things last night.  First, there was the election 
and re-election of pro-life Democrats to various political offices.  The
 group Democrats for Life of America mentioned a number of pro-life candidates for the Democratic Party, such as Joe Donnelly, who beat controversial tea-partier and pro-lifer Richard Mourdock
 in the Indiana race for the U.S. Senate, and others.  Speaking 
personally, I do not know what the best law would be when it comes to 
abortion.  But I am appreciative when Democrats include in their support
 for social justice a high regard for the life of the vulnerable 
unborn.  2012 must have been an especially tough year for pro-life 
Democrats, as Barack Obama and the national Democratic Party emphasized 
their pro-choice position to get the support of women, as well as 
allowed their pro-choice position (among other things) to take them to 
victory.  I myself voted with the Democrats, notwithstanding my 
reservations about their pro-choice abortion stance.  And so it's 
refreshing that there were pro-life Democrats who won last night, and I 
hope that this presages more diversity on abortion within the Democratic
 Party.
Second, I appreciated the election of two solid 
progressives who are willing to fight for their beliefs and the 
well-being of the American people.  I think specifically of Elizabeth 
Warren, who was elected to be a U.S. Senator from Massachusetts, and 
Tammy Baldwin, who will represent Wisconsin in the U.S. Senate.  
Regarding Warren, I enjoyed this passage in an article in Business Week,
 which has even more significance now that she has won: ""Congressional 
Republicans, Wall Street bankers, and business lobbyists will be 
confronted with the possibility that by driving Warren out of the 
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB),which she helped establish, 
and which they agitated to keep her from heading, they created a far 
bigger and more threatening animal: a hugely ambitious senator with 
national star power, command of financial affairs, and the stature to 
influence President Obama (should he prevail) or play the role of 
maddening foil to President Romney."  Well said!  And, on Tommy Baldwin,
 she is a strong proponent of a single-payer health care system, and she
 has criticized Obamacare because she thinks that it is corporate 
welfare for the pharmaceuticals and inhibits Medicare from negotiating 
for lower drug prices.  Both Warren and Baldwin will be needed voices in
 the U.S. Senate.
Third, I liked the attitude of conciliation,
 as Mitt Romney's web site played Obama's acceptance speech, and Obama 
pledged to meet with Mitt Romney to discuss the future of this country. 
 Obama also thanked those who participated in the Romney campaign.  
While all this may look standard, it was meaningful to me because of 
things that I've heard (from watching pundits on Charlie Rose's show, 
for example) about Obama and Romney not liking or respecting each other,
 as well as constructive criticism of Obama that says that Obama will 
have to work harder in his second term to form relationships with a 
variety of people (i.e., supporters, businesspeople, legislators, 
etc.).  I hope that President Obama can do this, without compromising 
significantly on progressive principles.
And, fourth, there 
were things that I liked about Mitt Romney's concession speech, and 
Barack Obama's acceptance speech.  Mitt Romney said that Ann would have 
made a great First Lady, and I agree with him on that, as happy as I am 
that Michelle Obama will continue to be the First Lady for the next four
 years.  I have liked Ann Romney's participation in her husband's 
campaign because she added a human element to it, as she appeared on The View, hosted Good Morning America one morning,
 and was on late-night talk shows.  She was certainly an asset to her 
husband's campaign, and I could tell from what Mitt said about his wife 
in his concession speech that he really loves her.  Regarding Obama's 
speech, I thought it noteworthy that Obama mentioned the problem of 
climate change, for a number of leftists have complained that climate 
change has not been much of a theme in the 2012 election.  But Obama 
signaled that he is still committed to addressing it.