I've got two links for today:
1. Whenever I go home to Indiana, I like to catch up on The Journal, which is a newspaper about churches within the Armstrongite movement. I was reading The Journal online last night, and I found an insightful article by its editor, Dixon Cartwright, entitled Lo and behold, an elephant is in our room: Origins of the Bible can be a touchy subject.
The article is about how we can have a spiritual walk when the Bible
appears to have a lot of problems: politics, portrayals of God as
not-so-good, etc. Cartwright also effectively dismisses common
arguments for the Bible's inspiration: fulfilled prophecy, and II
Timothy 3:16 saying that all Scripture is inspired. While Cartwright
rejects what he considers to be Bible-olatry, he still believes in God
and miracles, thinks that the Bible contains profound material that can
help people in their walk with God, and fellowships on the Sabbath and
annual holy days.
To my surprise, a number of letters to the editor in The Journal
were quite supportive of Mr. Cartwright's stance. I have not read all
of the letters responding to Mr. Cartwright, but you can read them here.
applaud Dixon Cartwright's honesty as he grapples with difficult
questions. I, too, wrestle with the question of how I can have a
religious or spiritual life, when I have problems with certain things in
2. My friend Felix has an Intelligent Quote of the Day on his blog, which features an insightful comment that Amaranth made on the blog, Confessions of a Former Conservative.
Amaranth is criticizing the tendency of some conservatives to sit in
judgment of the poor without considering what it's like to be in their
“Roman but Not Catholic” is released today
1 hour ago