Paul Wilbur. Touching the Heart of God: Embracing the Calendar of the Kingdom. Apopka, FL: Certa Books, 2015. See here to buy the book.
Paul Wilbur is a Messianic Jewish musician. I love his music and have three of his CDs.
If I were to identify a central theme of Touching the Heart of God,
it would be that Paul Wilbur encourages Christians to observe, or at
least honor, the feasts that the Jews observe. This would include the
feasts that are in Leviticus 23, and also Purim and Hanukkah. For
Wilbur, these feasts are ways that believers can celebrate God’s works
in history and anticipate God’s works to come.
That, at the base-level, is what Wilbur is arguing. Also, Wilbur
wants for Gentile churches to be more sensitive to Messianic Jews and
their practices, in pursuing the unity that God wants for Christians to
have. Those are the consistent messages in this book. On some other
issues in the book (issues that are still related to the central
issues), Wilbur does not strike me as overly consistent. For example,
does God require Christians, including Gentile Christians, to observe
the Old Testament feasts? There are times when Wilbur explicitly
answers that question in the negative, but there are also times when he
seems to be leaning in the “yes” direction. A strong part of me does
not fault Wilbur for his inconsistency on this, for Wilbur is wrestling
with a biblical text that says all sorts of things: one that says that
the barrier of commandments between Jews and Gentiles has been torn down
in Christ (Ephesians 2:15) and that appears to exempt Gentiles from
keeping the Torah (Acts 15), but one that also affirms that Gentiles in
the time of Israel’s eschatological restoration will be required to
observe the Feast of Tabernacles (Zechariah 14). I would have preferred
for Wilbur to have arrived at a neater resolution of these tensions,
without being too artificial in smoothing out the apparent differences.
Maybe I am too idealistic in this regard; at the same time, I have read
people who have taken their best shot at resolving difficult issues,
and I am intrigued with what they come up with, even if I do not
entirely agree with their conclusions. I was hoping to find this in
Wilbur’s book.
Wilbur is also slightly inconsistent in his categorization of the
biblical festivals. He states that the spring feasts are about what God
did in the past, which includes the history of Israel in the Old
Testament and also the work of Christ that resulted from Christ’s first
coming, whereas the fall feasts are about what God did in the future, in
an eschatological sense. The spring feasts are Passover, the Days of
Unleavened Bread, the Feast of Firstfruits, and Pentecost, and the fall
feasts are the Feast of Trumpets, the Day of Atonement, and the Feast of
Tabernacles. Obviously, one cannot take Wilbur’s categorization in an
absolute sense: the Feast of Tabernacles is a fall festival, but it
commemorates the past, the time when the Israelites dwelt in booths in
the wilderness (Leviticus 23:43). The Day of Atonement is also a fall
festival, but, according to the Epistle to the Hebrews, it concerns the
work of Christ as high priest. There are indications in the book that
Wilbur himself does not take his categorization of the feasts in an
absolute sense. My favorite passage in the book is on page 60, where
Wilbur appears to imply that Passover and Pentecost, both spring
festivals, will have a future fulfillment. Whereas the Passover was
originally about Israel’s exodus from Egypt, in the future it will
celebrate the gathering of the Jewish people from all nations.
Pentecost was originally about the giving of the Torah, and it would
later be the day on which the Christians would receive the Holy Spirit
(Acts 2), but, according to Wilbur, in the future it will concern all of
Israel’s sons and daughters prophesying (Joel 2). I wish that more of
the book was like this passage on page 60, acknowledging that the
biblical holy days could have a past and future fulfillment, and maybe
even discussing how elements of Israel’s past will occur again in the
future (i.e., an exodus, Israel dwelling the wilderness, Israel
receiving a revelation of God, etc.). The book would have been so much
richer.
Wilbur seems to imply that he consulted Messianic Jewish scholar
Michael Brown in writing this book. In my opinion, the book would have
been better had he done so more. Then, the book would have cited
primary sources about Jewish traditions. The section about Messiah ben
Joseph and Messiah ben David would have been better: Wilbur, in my mind,
gets some things wrong in that section, but his overall point appears
to be that there are Jewish traditions that apply Isaiah 53 to the
Messiah; consulting Michael Brown or his books would have made that
section a lot stronger. Wilbur states that Christmas is not pagan but
was observed in patristic times, so he does not strike me as
anti-Christmas. That is a valid and a scholarly argument, but the same
can be said for honoring Sunday, the first day of the week, and yet
Wilbur seems to argue that Constantine replaced the Sabbath with
Sunday. Had Wilbur consulted scholars and scholarship more, this book
could have been more interesting and more nuanced.
(I should add that Wilbur’s stance towards paganism and Gentile
Christianity was another example of his apparent inconsistency. He
criticized Easter throughout the book. He appears to buy into the view
that Easter can be traced back to Nimrod’s wife! You would think that
he is against God’s people doing pagan things or drawing from the
pagans, but he seems to imply a couple of times that Rosh Hoshanah is
related, in some manner, to the Babylonian New Year festival. Moreover,
Wilbur is not against Christians worshiping on Sunday, but he is for
adding Jewish elements to churches, such as having a Friday night
service.)
Those without much familiarity with Jewish festivals may find this
book interesting. I come from a Christian tradition that did observe
them (Armstrongism), so I did not learn a whole lot from Wilbur’s book.
Still, Wilbur could have made the book a lot richer than it is.
There was something to which the book sensitized me, however, and
that is how evangelical Christianity is becoming increasingly open to
Jewish customs. Do you remember Bill McCartney, the football coach who
helped start Promise Keepers? Do you ever wonder what happened to him?
Well, according to Wilbur, McCartney is involved in Messianic Judaism.
Evangelical churches are having Friday night services in which the
Torah is read. I thought back to a book that I read by evangelical
scholar Walter Kaiser, which argued that Christians would do well to
observe the Levitical dietary laws. I, for one, applaud the attempts of
evangelicals to connect with the Jewish roots of the Christian faith,
to dig deeply into what is in the Hebrew Bible, just so long as it does
not lead to legalism (i.e., saying that Gentile Christians have to
observe Old Testament laws). Wilbur navigates through these delicate
issues, and I appreciate his effort and his sensitivity to certain
nuances.
I received a complimentary review copy of this book through Bookcrash, in exchange for an honest review.