These past days have been the sort of days in which crap from my past
enters my mind. I was remembering an incident this morning. I was an
undergraduate in college over a decade ago, and I said something
sarcastic to one of my dorm-mates, an atheist. He replied: “That sounds
pretty sarcastic. Jesus, I think, would have a different approach!”
I don’t think I had any snappy comeback then. Since that time, I have thought of what I should have said: “Yeah, well, it would take Jesus to live with you!” Remember that Family Guy
episode in which Stewie went back in time to give Brian a snappy
comeback? Maybe a more appropriate comparison would be the time that
George in Seinfeld wanted to use his “jerk-store” comeback, and it fell flat when he had an opportunity to do so!
I don’t entirely remember why I was being sarcastic in that
incident. My dorm-mate may have been baiting me about something. I
don’t know. He often liked to put people on the spot.
Would Jesus have even had a different approach? Well, Jesus did use
his share of sarcasm, especially against his Pharisee critics. Of
course, some people take this thought a little too far. I remember
hearing Ann Coulter speak, and she appealed to the example of Christ to
justify her own sarcasm. I don’t think that being like Jesus means
never criticizing anything or anyone. When it amounts, though, to
dehumanizing the other “side” and making them out to be the enemy, well,
I would say something is wrong there, from a Christian perspective.
Kindness and love are supposed to fit into the Christian life somewhere,
right? I don’t see much kindness towards liberals in Ann Coulter’s
columns. “Yeah, well, liberals aren’t kind either.” Do two wrongs make
a right, for either side?
How could I have handled that situation with my dorm-mate? I did
handle it honestly, as a human being. Not perfectly, but honestly.
Do I regret any sarcasm on my part as I look back? Yeah, I would say
so. Not that conversation with my dorm-mate, but I would say so. That
season in my life when I was rebelling against evangelicalism and
right-wing conservatism, I could be very sarcastic, mocking other
people’s positions, using the reductio ad-absurdum in caricaturing
people’s views. I could have handled that a bit better, I think. I
should at least try to respect what people say, rather than treating
what they say as stupid.
This morning, though, I did somewhat venture into the realm of
sarcasm. Someone posted a meme of C.S. Lewis’ statement that hell
begins as a grumble, which the grumbler himself may even criticize, and
eventually he gets to the point where he cannot turn it off. A
commenter responded to that meme by saying that it shows God does not
send people to hell, but people send themselves to hell, which answers
the question of how a loving God can send people to hell. I replied: “God can’t overcome people’s grumbling moods when they have a hard time turning them off?”
Sounds a bit sarcastic. Not abusive or trollish, but sarcastic. I’ve
just had a long aversion to that whole line of “People send themselves
to hell.”
I’m not sure if my point will be understood—-I don’t exactly provide
much context, and the commenter may wonder what exactly I’m addressing.
Well, among other things, I’m questioning his idea that we have perfect
free will and that God is not responsible, at least in C.S. Lewis’
scenario, for people going to hell. If we are grumbling and can’t turn
it off, our free-will is limited! How can I be blamed if I am grumbling
and can’t turn it off? How can people in hell be blamed for that?
Can’t God turn off their grumble? “Yeah, but God respects people’s free
will.” What free will, in that case? “Well, our characters are
cumulative, and we should remember that deciding wrong today will make
deciding right tomorrow much more difficult, and that is our fault, not
God’s.” Joshua Ryan Butler did not use those words, but he made that
sort of point in his book, The Skeletons in God’s Closet. My response to that would be: “Is not God supposed to be the God of new beginnings?”
I could have written a complex treatise that readers would probably
skip. Instead I wrote a pithy comment that readers may skip because I
didn’t provide much context!
Anyway, those are some ramblings. I know sarcastic comments can get
lots of likes. They can also be dismissed by those who want a higher
level of discussion!
Monday, February 23, 2015
Scattered Ramblings on Sarcasm (With a Detour About Hell)
Labels:
Family Guy,
Life,
Politics,
Religion,
School,
Seinfeld,
Television