David Zac Niringiye.  The Church: God’s Pilgrim People.  Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 2015.  See here to buy the book.
David Zac Niringiye is an African theologian and former bishop in the Church of Uganda.  In The Church: God’s Pilgrim People,
 Niringiye critiques the current state of the church (not the Church of 
Uganda specifically, but the Christian church in general) and offers a 
biblical history of the church in order to define what the church is and
 what it is supposed to be.
Niringiye argues, understandably, that the church falls short of what
 it should be.  As Niringiye notes, it is a problem when many people in 
Ruwanda attend church, yet hate their enemies and seek to kill them.  
There is an obvious disconnect there.  The Western church does not 
escape Niringiye’s criticism, either, for he is critical of the 
disparities in wealth in the worldwide church.  For Niringiye, the 
church has largely failed to be the community of love that it should be,
 or to be salt and light in the world.
For Niringiye, the church itself is not the Kingdom of God, and yet 
the church relates to the Kingdom of God: Christians are citizens of the
 Kingdom, they pray for it to come, and they do their part to bring the 
world under the rule of Christ.  The church is present in the Old 
Testament, Niringiye narrates, as God sought to establish a community of
 worshipers through Adam, Noah, Abraham, and Moses.  The successor to 
Old Testament Israel, according to Niringiye, is the Christian church.  
Niringiye strikes me as supersessionist in his view, here.
Niringiye believes that the church should be a missionary church, 
proclaiming the good news of what Christ has done.  At the same time, 
Niringiye also does not preclude the possibility that God may be 
involved in non-Christian cultures and the lives of non-Christians.
Another point that Niringiye makes is that Christians from different 
ethnicities can learn from one another, and that this can give them a 
fuller appreciation of Jesus and God’s love.  As an example, Niringiye 
states that Jewish Christians in the first century considered Jesus the 
Messiah, whereas Greek-speaking Christians called Jesus lord, “the 
titles that Greek Christians used for their cult divinities (Acts 
11:19-21)” (page 183).  Both learned from one another, Niringiye states.
There were cases in which I was not entirely sure if I agreed with 
Niringiye, but what he said was thought-provoking.  On page 41, for 
example, in talking about Moses, Niringiye contrasts the God of Israel 
with the gods of Egypt.  According to Niringiye, the God of Israel was 
“relational, in-community, in himself and with humankind and creation”, 
whereas the Egyptian gods were “distant” and “impersonal”.  (This is in 
terms of how they conceptualized their deities.)  Was this the case?  
Was the God of Israel conceptually more relational than the gods of 
Egypt?  Some believe that the God of Israel was different from ancient 
Near Eastern deities, whereas others highlight the similarities, seeing 
the God of Israel as just another ancient Near Eastern deity, not 
fundamentally different from how other ancient Near Easterners 
conceptualized their deities.  I am skeptical when Jewish and 
Christians, to support their religion, maintain that their religion was 
superior to other religions in the past; at the same time, I do not rule
 out completely that ancient Judaism and Christianity may have been 
better, in areas, from a humanitarian perspective.  Some would say it 
was worse, in areas.  Niringiye’s comments, and similar comments in the 
book, provoked thought about this issue.
Niringiye talked about Christians helping to bring the world under 
the dominion of Christ, and that frightened me, a bit.  It sounded 
somewhat like Christian Reconstructionism, or what elements of the 
religious right want to do.  I respect that Niringiye was talking about 
missions, love, inclusion, and social justice, but, since he was a 
religious leader in Uganda, I wondered what his stance was towards the 
Ugandan anti-homosexuality bill.  I will not try to define his position 
myself, but I will provide two links:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2009/decemberweb-only/151-42.0.html
http://oblogdeeoblogda.me/2013/02/16/ugandan-bishop-attacked-by-anti-gay-makere-university-students/
The book is a bit meandering.  It sometimes speaks in generalities 
rather than fleshing out what it is trying to say.  Still, in its own 
way, it was an edifying read, and it made important points.
I received a complimentary review copy of this book from the publisher, in exchange for an honest review.
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
