At church this morning, the pastor was preaching about the story of 
Zacchaeus in Luke 19:1-10.  Zacchaeus was a rich tax collector, and tax 
collectors were unpopular among Jews because there were tax collectors 
who defrauded people or exacted more than was due to them (Luke 3:13), 
growing rich as a result.  Jesus was passing through Jericho, and 
Zacchaeus climbed the sycamore tree to see who Jesus was, since 
Zacchaeus was a short man.  Jesus came, looked up, and told Zacchaeus 
that he (Jesus) would be coming to stay at Zacchaeus’ house.  Zacchaeus 
came down from the tree and welcomed Jesus.  People standing there were 
grumbling that Jesus was about to be the guest of a sinner, 
and Zacchaeus told Jesus that he (Zacchaeus) would give half of his 
possessions to the poor and pay back fourfold those whom he defrauded.  
Jesus said that salvation has come to this house, for Zacchaeus is a son
 of Abraham, and the Son of Man came to seek and to save the lost.
The pastor talked about a variety of topics.  He was jokingly, yet 
honestly, saying that he tended to view himself as a low-level sinner, 
regardless of what his Methodist theology teaches him.  He said that he felt that he was not as bad as some sinners, and not too
 bad of a sinner, period.  (He seemed to be implying that this was not 
how he was supposed to feel, but it was still how he honestly felt.)  He likened 
Zacchaeus to Bernie Madoff, who stole millions from people and destroyed
 people’s lives.  The pastor asked if God’s grace can run that deep, and
 he referred to a church he attended that reached out to addicts.  The 
pastor was contrasting the beatitudes in the Gospel of Matthew with the 
beatitudes in the Gospel of Luke.  Matthew’s beatitudes bless the poor 
in spirit and those who hunger for righteousness (Matthew 5), whereas 
Luke’s beatitudes bless the poor and hungry, while proclaiming woe to 
the rich, the full, and the popular (Luke 6).  The pastor also referred 
to the Parable of Lazarus: the afflicted poor person went to Abraham’s 
bosom after his death, whereas the rich man went to Hades, a place of 
torment (Luke 16).  One can add Mary’s Magnificat to the list of Luke’s 
passages about the rich and the poor: it talks about God lifting up the 
poor and hungry, while bringing down the proud and powerful and sending 
the rich away empty (Luke 1:52-53).  The Gospel of Luke appears to be 
anti-rich.  Yet, here Jesus is, reaching out to rich Zacchaeus!  The 
pastor said that Jesus was not standing with his arms crossed, waiting 
for Zacchaeus to offer to make restitution; that was something that 
Zacchaeus himself decided to do, but Jesus was just reaching out to lost
 Zacchaeus.  The pastor inquired why Zacchaeus wanted to see Jesus, and 
he speculated that it was because Zacchaeus was lonely.  The pastor then
 said that there are ways in which each of us is lost, or has been lost,
 and Jesus seeks and saves us.  And, even if we consider ourselves 
lower-level sinners, the pastor said, we can make restitution to people.
I’ll let my summary of the story and the sermon stand, without adding
 too many thoughts of my own.  Even if I may not always consider myself 
to be as bad as than certain sinners, I should still remember that Jesus
 is compassionate towards all sinners, desiring their restoration.
One part of the story that stands out to me is Jesus’ statement that 
salvation has come to Zacchaeus’ house because Zacchaeus, too, is a son 
of Abraham.  Is Zacchaeus now a son of Abraham because of his 
repentance?  I think of John the Baptist’s statement in Luke 3:8, 
encouraging people to bear fruit of repentance rather than seeking 
refuge in their status as Abraham’s children.  Zacchaeus was an 
Israelite, like the other Israelites there, but perhaps his repentance 
was his affirmation of what being an Israelite ethically and spiritually
 entailed.  Or maybe Jesus was saying that the other Israelites there 
should accept Zacchaeus as a fellow son of Abraham, with an identity as 
part of God’s chosen people: they should have compassion for that sinner
 and desire his repentance, as opposed to looking down on him and 
criticizing Jesus for reaching out to him.  They should embrace and 
applaud Jesus’ outreach to Israel, God’s chosen people, and Jesus’ 
outreach to Zacchaeus was a part of that.  Or maybe part of it was Jesus
 telling Zacchaeus that he was a son of Abraham, a part of the community
 of God’s people: Zacchaeus could see himself as part of a community as 
opposed to separating himself from the community through his 
exploitation of his fellow Israelites.  Zacchaeus did not have to feel 
so lonely, for he was part of something larger than himself.
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
