My friend Felix reviewed progressive Christian blogger Michael Camp's 31 reasons for leaving evangelicalism and becoming a progressive but not a liberal. Felix copy-and-pasted Camp's post on his own blog and offered his own reactions in red. I'll do the same thing.
Okay, in the spirit of Rachel Held Evans' blog post on 13 Things that Make Me a Lousy Evangelical (and a Lousy Progressive and a Lousy Feminist), I've come up with my own list of 31 reasons I left evangelicalism and became a progressive (for lack of a better term) but not a liberal. So, here we go:
1. I'm allergic to contempary Christian music.  I  don't mind it myself, but I don't listen to it as much nowadays.  When I  do listen to music (which is rare), it's usually secular pop.  I like  the sound of contemporary Christian music, but sometimes it makes me  feel uncomfortable because I start evaluating my reaction to the  theology of the lyrics.
2. I never believed in the inerrancy  of the Bible (and think it's rather obvious it's not inerrant) and got  tired of hiding that fact.  I  don't worry about it that much, to tell you the truth.  I just assume  that God is a God of unconditional love.  If there is a way for the  Bible to conform to that, fine.  If not, then I don't worry about it,  for there are plenty of people who testify that God has been  unconditionally loving in their own lives.  Plus, I need a God who is  unconditionally loving.
3. I realized biblicism (the notion  that the Bible is infallible, internally consistent, universally  applicable, contains all the truth we need, and makes us certain about  most everything) is intellectually hallow and dishonest (see The Bible Made Impossible).  I  have issues with biblicism myself, for the Bible does strike me as a  diverse collection of writings.  And I feel no compulsion to harmonize  contradictions in an artificial manner.
4. I think it's not  only fine to try to ascertain what Jesus meant or what Bible authors  meant, in the original culture, but more importantly, if we don't, we're  not taking the Bible seriously. We love tradition over truth.  I  think it's good to try to do this.  At the same time, it's interesting  that Bible readers throughout history did not have an IVP Bible  Background Commentary, yet they got along fairly adequately.  But, for  me, putting the Bible in its ancient Near Eastern setting largely  illustrates how it was a product of ANE time and culture. 
5.  I think it's perfectly acceptable to pick and choose what one thinks is  inspired and true in the Bible. After all, that's how the Bible was  composed. Someone else picked and chose and copied and translated, so  why can't we? Why do we have to take it on faith and they get to decide?  How does one do that you ask? Have an open mind, look at objective  biblical scholarship, use some common sense, and let the Spirit speak to  your heart. What? You think that's crazy? If accepting everthing at  face value works, then why does evangelicalism have a thousand  denominations and opinions about what the Bible teaches?   I agree with much of this.  I sympathize somewhat, however, with  fundamentalism's question of how we can trust any of the Bible, if we do  not believe in all of it.  What should be the foundation of our  theology, if we cannot even see God?  At  the same time, even conservative Christians do not accept all of the  Bible, for they downplay or soften many of the parts that disagree with  their theology.  The Bible is filtered through human subjectivity, which  stresses some parts while downplaying other parts.  So what can I do?  I  guess I can be open to whatever wisdom the Bible offers, use common  sense, get counsel from others, and pray.  And God won't stop loving me  if I get things wrong.
6. Despite 2-5 above, I think much of the Bible is inspired by God.  It  has good stories, principles, and observations about how life works.  I  don't worry a great deal these days about whether the Bible is inspired  and how it is inspired.  I just read it, and maybe God can use it to  inspire me.
7. After studying the historical and cultural  context of the Bible and learning how it has sometimes been miscopied,  and frequently mistranslated and misinterpreted (by people who care more  about tradition than truth), I find it a remarkably progressive  book--okay, okay, minus that stuff about genocide and killing women and  children, etc.   I agree that it is progressive in that it often champions the poor  against their oppressors.  I think, though, that conservative Christians  downplay the less progressive parts (lifelong slavery for non-Israelite  captives) in their attempts to argue that the Bible is  divinely-inspired.  And I also have issues with the Conquest, especially  since the Israelites did not have to kill the women and children.  For  people outside of Canaan, God had the Israelites take the women and  children as captives, while killing only the men.  Why couldn't that  have been the policy for the Canaanites, as well (assuming it's moral in  the first place for one people-group to displace another).
8. I might be called to love him, but I don't like Rick Warren, and especially those Hawaiian shirts he wears.  Like  Felix, I disagree with Warren's stance that abused wives can't leave  their husbands.  I also think that the Purpose-Driven Life is over-rated  and promotes group-think.  But I appreciated some of Rick Warren's  questions to Barack Obama and John McCain in 2008, for some of them were  not the typical right-wing garbage (i.e., thou shalt not flip-flop).   He also does appear to be progressive on some issues.
9. R.C. Sproul defending Mark Driscoll makes me a bit nauseous. Okay, a lot nauseous.  I  respect R.C. Sproul, on some level, because he fairly articulates  different perspectives.  But I don't like how some evangelicals point to  him as some major apologist I should follow, for (as is the case with  most apologists) I don't think he proves Christianity is true.  As for  Mark Driscoll, I can't stand him.  I think he comes across as a pompous  jerk and a bully.  If he says I should do something, I'm tempted to do  the opposite.
10. I not only think believing in The Rapture is delusional, but also believing we live in the end times too.  I  agree, especially since every time since the time after Christ's death  has been labeled "the end times" by Christians, so why should I take it  seriously?  As for the pre-trib rapture, I understand how some  Christians arrive at that, but the church fathers didn't believe in it,  and biblical texts that supposedly support it have other plausible  interpretations.
11. I believe Jesus already returned (figuratively) in the first century (you gotta read my book).  I'm  open to preterism.  It certainly beats being afraid of living in the  end-times!  It also makes a good-faith attempt to explain how Jesus was  not wrong when he said or implied that he would come back in "this  generation" or in the lifetime of his disciples.  But I have a nagging  feeling that preterism is just some inadequate way to defend the Bible.   Jesus often presents his coming as corresponding with judgment on the  nations, redemption, salvation, etc.  That did not happen in 70 C.E.  So  was Jesus wrong?  Maybe.  I still hope that God will intervene and make  this world better, though.
12. I believe the Bible teaches the good guys get left behind (again, it's in the book).  Yup.  One is taken, the other is left.  The taken one goes where the vultures are, or something like that.
13. I sometimes agree with R.C. Sproul. For example, he actually pretty much believes #11 too.   Calvinism disgusts me, but, like I said, I like how R.C. looks at  different perspectives and evaluates them, even if I don't agree with  where he ends up.
14. Going to a U2 concert is a spiritual experience for me.   I don't listen to U2, but I admire Bono for his humanitarian work and  for reaching out to right-wing Christian figures to encourage them to  show compassion for the least of these.
 15. I no longer believe evolution is the enemy.  I think there's evidence for it.  What its theological implications are, I'm not sure yet.
16. I think intelligent design is a grand idea that needs to be seriously considered.  I'm  against censorship, so, yes, give ID a fair hearing.  But I also don't  think gaps in our scientific knowledge should lead to a "God did it"  that precludes attempts to find a scientific, naturalistic explanation.
17. I think one can be a practicing gay or lesbian and still follow Christ.  This  is a hard one for me.  I consider myself to be for gay rights, in the  sense that I oppose discrimination in housing and employment.  I also  really don't care if gays marry, as long as the law respects religious  institutions not going along with that (as New York's law does).  I also  think that gays can be good people and experience God, since that  occurs in churches, synagogues, AA meetings, etc.  But can a practicing  gay or lesbian follow "Christ"?  My reading of Scripture is that the  Bible disapproves of homosexual activity, and I've not been convinced by  exegetical attempts to argue otherwise.  But is the Bible right that  this is God's will?  I'd have problems telling a person he has to be  celibate for the rest of his natural life.  I doubt that God is that  cruel.
18. I'm a microbrew enthusiast and love to talk theology over a couple of brews.  I'm  a tee-totaler, not for religious reasons, but because drinking is not  good for me personally.  And, overall, I have issues with talking  theology, since what it often amounts to is someone else trying to shove  his or her religion down my throat.  I'd NEED a brew to endure that!
19. Rick Perry makes me really nervous (but not as much as Sarah Palin).  He  has a certain charm, but he exemplifies so many things that I hate  about evangelicals.  His whining about persecution for his faith comes  to mind.  And I don't care what his apologists say: he was hosting that  prayer rally to get evangelical votes.  I mean, he announced his run for President not long  after it.  Regarding Sarah Palin, I at first liked her because she  struck me as a populist, a reformer, and a common person.  Plus, she was  hot.  Nowadays, I'm not impressed by her lack of knowledge, plus I  believe the testimony of those who say she can be a mean girl.  I'm also  sick of her continual whining and playing the victim.
20. I hate sexual exploitation but find some erotica perfectly acceptable for adults.  Are  we talking about pornography here?  I steer clear of it.  I'm not the  sort of guy who leaves the room when there's nudity in a movie.  But I  don't want to become addicted to Internet porn.  
21. I think  the evangelical church is sex-negative (okay, there are a few good  evangelical marriage sex manuals out there, but that's the only  exception).  I'd say it is, and  unrealistically so.  People's drives encourage them to have sex.  But we  don't want venereal diseases and unwanted pregnancies.  Consequently, I  favor birth control.
22. I think Charlize Theron is hot and I'm not afraid to admit it.  Oh, she's okay, I guess.
23. I voted for Barak Obama. I still support him but see a lot of things he could do better.  I  voted for McCain, but I admired Obama.  Nowadays, I don't think he's  overly adept as a leader, but he's more compassionate and reasonable  than a lot of Republicans.  
24. I hate it when Republicans  accuse Obama of doing or proposing things that George W. Bush (increased  the deficit by $5 trillion) and Ronald Reagan did (raised taxes 11  times).  I agree.  At least the  Obama deficit would stimulate the economy by putting money in people's  pockets!  On a related note, I also hated how conservatives lambasted  liberal incivility when Bush was President, and then they turned around  and trashed Obama, calling him Hitler, etc.
25. I think what evangelicals call "church" is a non-biblical, man-made construct (back to my book, and yes, these are shameless plugs!).  I  don't think so, but I haven't read Michael's book!  The church is in  the NT.  There were meetings.  There was discipline.  Does that mean I  believe everyone is required to go to church?  No.  But I find that it  gives me inspiration and community.
26. I think nine times  out of ten spiritual disciplines (praying, fasting, time in the Word,  worship, going to cutting-edge, spiritual conferences, and following the  latest, trendy book -- think Purpose Driven Life) becomes a legalistic  treadmill.  I think those things  can be a tread-mill, but I need them (on some level) to encourage myself  to have a good attitude and to meet life in constructive ways.  I've  done them differently over the years, though.  I used to pray an hour  each day over Scripture.  Nowadays, I read devotionals and pray for ten  minutes, and also when I feel a need to pray.
27. After studying the issue and examining the historical and biblical evidence, I became a Universalist.  I think that's a plausible reading of much of Scripture.   Eternity does not last forever in parts of the Bible, nor does the fire  that is not quenched.  And there are passages in Paul about God  reconciling all.  But some things in Scripture, in my opinion, are hard  to square with universalism.  Why, for example, would God delay his  parousia so people would have time to repent (II Peter 3), if they have  opportunities to repent after the parousia?
28. I think the  emergent "conversation" is good (and I really like Brian McLaren), but  wish they'd come to a concluson once in awhile. Just for grins.  I'm  pretty much satisfied with them, even when their arguments are bad.  I  think that their conversations lead to edifying ideas, plus they point  out where conservative Christianity has problems and offer an  alternative (and, in my view, better) outlook.
29. I often disagree with Bishop Spong, but sometimes I do agree with him.  I  actually think I read him more in my conservative days than I have  lately!  I think I agree with him on many things, but I differ from him  in that I believe in a personal God.  And, while I found him to be  affable when he taught at Harvard Divinity School, I find him to be  pompous and closed-minded in his polemics.
30. I like Bishop Spong way more than Rick Warren or Mark Driscoll.  Heck, I like Pat Robertson more than Mark Driscoll! 
31. I think the truth is embodied in a composite of Marcus Borg and N.T. Wright.   Yeah, probably.  I agree with Borg that Jesus challenged the purity  system.  But I like how Wright places Jesus' mission into the story of  Israel. 
I could go on, but you get the picture. Please comment, challenge me, and share your own lists of where you're at!
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
