Louis St Michael. Jesus and Muhammad: Their Messages, Side-by-Side. Rising Myhrr, 2018. See here to purchase the book.
This book compares Jesus’s sayings in the biblical Gospels with
Muhammad’s sayings in the Quran. On one page is Jesus’s sayings on a
given topic, and on the opposite page is Muhammad’s comments on that
topic. Rarely is there comment from the author, Louis St Michael, though
there is an occasional footnote that provides context. The topics are
numerous, but they encompass the mission of the messenger, warfare, the
stance towards insiders and outsiders, spirituality, sexuality,
morality, Satan, the afterlife, and eschatology.
The book also contains an extensive introduction and conclusion that
provides information about the religions. The introduction focuses on
Jesus and Muhammad themselves. It has a chart about the wars in which
Muhammad was engaged and the question of whether each war was
retaliatory, defensive, or a matter of conquest. The conclusion goes
more into doctrinal and denominational issues.
The book is recommended by academics in religious studies and in
Islam. Some specifically like that Louis St Michael places the
quotations side by side without commentary, allowing the texts to speak
for themselves.
Some thoughts:
A. To its credit, the book neither whitewashes nor demonizes
Muhammad. The sorts of passages that critics of Islam cite are in this
book, as are the passages that defenders of the religion cite. For
instance, Muhammad talked about the importance of forgiveness, but also
retaliation.
B. Of interest to me was Muhammad’s lack of assurance that he would
go to heaven after he died. This is stated in the book’s conclusion. The
reason that stood out to me was a quote in which Muhammad lists
requirements that please God: do one’s prayers, give to charity, etc.
One might look at that and think it is an easy enough checklist, in
contrast with how some Christians make God’s law into a standard of
perfection from which everyone falls short. Apparently, though, the
requirements did not give Muhammad assurance.
C. In the section about Jesus’s crucifixion, the book cites the
Quranic passage that appears to suggest that Jesus escaped the
crucifixion. However, Mark Robert Anderson, in The Quran in Context, cites passages that seem to accept that Jesus died (see, for example, 3.55, 116-118, 144; 5.75; 19.15, 33).
D. The book’s positives are that readers can get a flavor of what
Jesus in the Gospels and Muhammad in the Quran value, and they can look
up a given topic (i.e., homosexuality, war) to see what, if anything,
the source says. The book is good for reference in that sense. It is not
exactly a smooth or easy read, though, because not much interpretive
context or narrative is provided. The conclusion talks some about the
divisions within Islam about what in the Quran is authoritative for
today: is all of it authoritative, or have later passages superseded
earlier passages? Tying that to the actual passages under discussion may
have made the book easier to follow.
I received a complimentary copy of this book from the author. My review is honest.