The LCMS church that I attend has two Sunday School options for the 
next four weeks. One option is Andy Stanley’s series, “It’s Personal.” 
The other option is a discussion of the lectionary. The Andy Stanley 
option intrigued me because it addresses the issue of doubt and the 
barriers—both intellectual and personal—that people cite as inhibitors 
to their acceptance of the Christian faith. I decided to listen to the 
Andy Stanley series at home, and I will attend the lectionary Bible 
study at church. The LCMS church did not have its Wednesday Bible study 
this week, so I will use the time and space that I ordinarily devote to 
my mid-week Church Write-Up to a write-up about the Andy Stanley series.
Let’s start with a rough summary. Stanley acknowledges that people 
have legitimate, or at least understandable, reasons not to become 
Christians. They may wonder how the dinosaurs got onto the Ark. They may
 look at Christians and wonder why anyone would want to be like them, or
 they may have had bad experiences in churches. They may compare 
themselves with Christians and conclude that they live better lives than
 Christians do. Some may just be indifferent. “Why don’t I want to be a 
Christian? I don’t know—why don’t I want to stand on one foot all day? I
 just don’t want to be one.”
Stanley was encouraging people to desire to know and love God for 
himself, not to get their questions answered. Is that not the way many 
of us are: we want to be loved for us, not accepted after we answer 
people’s questions about us? We are that way because we are made in 
God’s image. Stanley said that most people who become Christians do so, 
not because their questions were answered, but because they had an 
experience in which they met and fell in love with God. One can have all
 one’s questions answered and still not be close to God.
Stanley drew a comparison with marriage. Single people may have a 
bunch of objections to getting married. Perhaps they struggle to support
 themselves financially, so how would they support both themselves and a
 spouse? What if they get married and then develop a connection with 
someone else, who could have been “the one”? But when they meet and fall
 in love with a person, those questions fall into the background. Sure, 
they will meet other people, but none of them will be that person. 
Before, they were looking at marriage as an issue, the way that many 
non-believers look at Christianity as an issue. After they meet the 
right person, they love that specific person, as believers are 
enraptured with Christ.
Throughout the series, Stanley referred to Scriptural examples. Abram
 did not have all of his questions answered when he believed in God and 
it was reckoned to him as righteousness (Genesis 15). He did not know 
how God would address his lack of offspring, and God did not tell him 
then and there. Nathaniel in John 1 was skeptical that Jesus was the 
Messiah because what good could come from Nazareth? Then Jesus revealed a
 personal detail that Jesus knew about him, and Nathaniel believed, even
 though that whole Nazareth question was not resolved. Saul of Tarsus 
encountered Jesus on the road to Damascus; he may have still had his 
religious questions about whether Jesus biblically qualified as the 
Messiah, but he could not deny the truth when he appeared to him. The 
Jewish leaders in John 9 had their reasons not to accept Jesus as the 
Messiah, yet there standing before him was a man who had been blind but 
now could see, due to Jesus.
Stanley expressed doubt that we would want a God who would be so 
undignified as to answer all of our questions before we accepted him. 
Stanley also referred to people’s experiences of God in Christ 
throughout the world, treating that as an unavoidable fact. Another 
point that Stanley made was that unbelievers may win a debate with their
 believing friend or spouse, but, after winning, there is still 
something that nags in their heart: the realization that God so loved 
the world.
A lot of what Stanley said hit close to home. I have some issues with
 the claim that one should just accept God, whether his or her questions
 are answered or not. Those questions are not just about curiosities. 
They pertain to whether the God of the Bible is real, and if that God is
 just, kind, and good (especially on such issues as hell and the 
biblical Conquest). In addition, not everyone, including not every 
Christian, has had a powerful experience of God.