For my Church Write-Up today, I will post items from the LCMS Sunday 
School class. The pastor was completing his series on I John.
A. I John 5:16 states: “If any man see his brother sin a sin which is
 not unto death, he shall ask, and he shall give him life for them that 
sin not unto death. There is a sin unto death: I do not say that he 
shall pray for it” (KJV).
There is a sin not unto death, and a sin unto death. The pastor said 
that the sin unto death was rejecting the faith. The reason that this 
sin is unforgivable is that faith is the means to receive forgiveness 
from God, so, if a person refuses that, he or she is shutting himself or
 herself off from forgiveness. We cannot judge who has committed this 
sin, though, because only God knows the heart. Even someone who appears 
to have rejected the faith may have some flicker of faith that the Holy 
Spirit can fan.
I asked the pastor to explain the part about praying and not praying 
for people who sin. Christians are encouraged to pray for those who have
 committed non-mortal sins, but John denies saying that Christians 
should pray for those who have committed the sin unto death. The pastor 
offered two explanations. First, Christians can pray that God might 
forgive those who have committed non-mortal sins, but they are offering a
 futile prayer if they pray that God might forgive those who commit the 
sin unto death. Why? Because as long as those who commit the sin unto 
death shut themselves off from faith, they cut themselves off from the 
possibility of forgiveness.
Second, the pastor suggested that John may have had a pastoral 
concern here. The church had suffered a huge split, as numerous 
followers of the Docetists left the church and rejected the Gospel that 
Christ came in the flesh and died for people’s sins. The church was 
trying to move on from that. John was recommending that they focus their
 prayers on those who sin yet stay in the faith, for it is too painful 
for them to pray for those who left the faith.
B. The pastor shared some illustrations. First, as he did before, he 
illustrated the church split in John’s day with the split that occurred 
in the Lutheran church in which he grew up. A charismatic movement split
 the church, resulting in the loss of half of the deacons and half of 
the children’s Sunday school class. That does sound rather jarring. 
Second, the pastor talked about an LCMS pastor who left the pastorate 
and his family to live with a man and was assuming the role of a Messiah
 to the gay community. I don’t know what the full story is there, but, 
after that pastor left, an elder told the church that the church is not 
its pastor, for the gifts and the forgiveness that they have are from 
God. John is making a similar point after his own church had undergone a
 traumatic split.
C. The pastor talked about the Johannine Comma, which appears in I 
John 5:7: “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, 
the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one” (KJV). The KJV 
has this verse, but most other modern language versions lack it, and the
 pastor explained why. I was familiar with the Johannine Comma, since I 
grew up in a non-Trinitarian church, and it said that the passage was 
inauthentic and was lacking in the earliest manuscripts. But I had not 
studied the details about this. The pastor said that the Comma was in 
Greek and Latin manuscripts produced later than the fourth century CE, 
and that it was probably added in response to an anti-Trinitarian heresy
 known as Priscillianism. After the eighteenth century, however, 
scholars had access to even earlier manuscripts, dating to the late 
third-early fourth century. One was a Greek New Testament in the Sinai 
monastery, one was in Alexandria, and one was in a Russian library. They
 lack the Comma.
Carroll D. Osburn’s article on the “Johannine Comma” in the Anchor Bible Dictionary
 goes into where the Comma appears and where it is missing. It was 
controversial before the eighteenth century, for it was lacking in many 
Greek manuscripts and Greek fathers, those one would expect to appeal to
 it if it was authentic. Priscillian is mentioned in the article: “The 
earliest uncontested use of the Comma is the Liber Apologeticus (1.4) of
 Priscillian, a 4th century bishop in Spain.” I will not do a research 
project about this right now, but I do wonder why Priscillian quoted it.
 What point was he trying to make? This and this source both state that Priscillianism was accused of being non-Trinitarian.
D. I John 5:8 states: “And there are three that bear witness in 
earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree 
in one” (KJV). How do these three things bear witness on earth? The 
pastor offered two interpretations. First, the passage may be about the 
death of Christ. Jesus gave up the spirit at death (John 19:30), and, on
 the cross, water and blood came from his side (John 19:34). John 19:35 
affirms the testimony of the person who saw this. Jesus’ death was 
significant in I John because John was combating the Docetists, who 
denied that Jesus was a flesh and blood human being who literally died. 
Second, the pastor said that the Spirit, water, and blood are witnesses 
on earth in a saving sense: they relate to the believer’s burial and 
resurrection with Jesus, as well as the reception of the Holy Spirit, at
 baptism.
E. John concludes his letter by saying: “Little children, keep 
yourselves from idols. Amen” (I John 5:21). Why? The pastor said it was a
 summary of John’s overall message: if John’s church is to take away 
anything from the letter, make sure it is this. Worship the true Jesus, 
not the false, idol Jesus of the Docetists.
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
