John Goldingay. An Introduction to the Old Testament: Exploring Text, Approaches and Issues. IVP Academic, 2015. See here to purchase the book.
John Goldingay is a biblical scholar who teaches Old Testament at
Fuller Theological Seminary. As the title indicates, this book is an
introduction to the Hebrew Bible/Old Testament.
Here are some observations and thoughts about the book:
A. The book asks readers to read biblical passages and answer
questions about them. One may enter into this book thinking it is a
workbook, but such an impression would be misleading. Although readers
are asked to do some work, Goldingay still shares his own insights about
the meaning, messages, and theological significance of biblical
writings, along with issues surrounding those writings, such as the
question of their historicity, and how they compare with ancient Near
Eastern religion and writings.
B. Goldingay frequently refers readers to online material, which is
located at his web site. The online material goes more deeply into
issues that are raised in this book.
C. I just read this book, without reading the tempting online
material and the biblical passages. Just reading the book by itself, I
questioned how effective of an introduction to the Hebrew Bible this
book would be for beginners. Don’t get me wrong: the book presents a
lot of scholarly information, in a lucid manner. You will get the
history of the Documentary Hypothesis, a summary of various positions on
the historicity of key biblical stories (i.e., the Exodus, the
Conquest), and a summary and interpretation of the highlights of each
biblical book. Not only was the book helpful in clarifying the biblical
text, but it also presented models and insights that were new to me;
its explanation of Job and Ecclesiastes, as well as its model for the
development of the Book of Daniel, come to mind as excellent
discussions. Each chapter is two pages, though, and that can easily
give the impression that the treatment of the material is rather
cursory. One needs to pay attention to what one is reading, or one may
miss significant details: it is like a quick car ride, in areas. If one
reads and interacts with the biblical passages, consults the materials
on Goldingay’s web site, and lingers over each chapter, however, that
may enhance, round out, and deepen the educational process.
D. The best aspect of this book, in my opinion, is its sensitivity
to Christian students who may have issues with the historical-critical
method of reading the Bible. Goldingay embraces that method. He
embraces positions that are conservative, but also positions that
conservatives would reject. But he attempts to offer a way forward for
people to accept the historical-critical method, while still having
faith in the Bible as divine revelation. For example, he rejects the
idea that the biblical writings are a bunch of pious frauds. When the
Book of Daniel depicts events prior to and during its day within the
genre of predictions about the future, as if Daniel was a figure from
the past who foresaw those events, Goldingay does not regard that as a
con job; he thinks that the Book of Daniel’s second century BCE audience
was well aware that those prophecies were written in their own time
rather than in the sixth century BCE, but they saw the point of the book
as God’s sovereignty over history. When people wrote in the name of
Moses or Isaiah, Goldingay maintains that they were not seeking to be
fraudulent, for people back then honored those who inspired them by
writing in their name. Goldingay does not really provide rigorous
support for these claims. One can challenge some of them: I think of
Bart Ehrman’s argument that forgery in the New Testament period was
looked down upon, even though it was practiced. Still, Goldingay does
well to offer these suggestions. If one wants to give the biblical
writers the benefit of a doubt, to posit a model in which they sincerely
believed in their message yet did things that many today would see as
fraudulent, then Goldingay’s suggestions may be the way to go.
E. The book frequently revisited the question of whether Old
Testament prophecies were actually fulfilled in history. When Isaiah
said something would happen to Assyria, for example, did it happen?
That is an important question, and Goldingay did well to address it,
honestly yet with sensitivity to theological ramifications.
F. I was ambivalent about his discussion of animal sacrifices.
Goldingay tried to distance sacrifices from being about atonement and
the forgiveness of sin. In one place, he states that the Epistle to the
Hebrews is right: as far as the Old Testament is concerned, the blood
of bulls and goats cannot take away sin! According to Goldingay, when
Psalm 51 talks about sacrifices being offered, that is after the broken
divine-human relationship is restored; the sacrifices are not what lead
to the restoration, but they are the worship of God that occurs after
the restoration. Goldingay may have a point. Unlike some evangelicals,
I doubt that every reference to sacrifices in the Hebrew Bible is about
atonement. They may concern seeking God’s favor by offering a gift,
showing God honor, or fellowship with God by eating a meal with God. At
the same time, I doubt that sacrifices can be divorced from atonement.
There are sin and guilt offerings, and, in Leviticus-Numbers, they seem
to relate to the forgiveness of unintentional sins, sometimes even
transgressions. In addition, if sacrifices were unrelated to atonement,
why does Hebrews go out of its way to deny that the blood of animals
can take away sin? Why would the blood of animals and atonement be
mentioned in the same sentence, if at least some did not posit a
connection between the two?
My critiques notwithstanding, I give this book five stars. It was informative and, in some cases, profound.
I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher. My review is honest!