Ahmed Lotfy Rashed. What Would a Muslim Say? Conversations, Questions, and Answers about Islam. Common Word Publishing, 2016. See here to purchase the book.
Ahmed Lotfy Rashed was born in Egypt and grew up in the United
States. His education and vocation are in the sciences, but he himself
is Muslim and is well-read in Islamic law and history. He has worked to
educate non-Muslims about Islam, by speaking at schools, churches, and
temples, and by responding to people’s e-mails about Islam.
This book is the first volume of a series that shares e-mail
conversations that Rashed has had with people about Islam. The book is
divided into sections, according to the questioner. Only the person’s
first name is presented, and Rashed states that the e-mails have been
edited to protect people’s privacy.
There is a spectrum of questioners who are presented in this book.
Some questioners are antagonistic towards Islam, seeing it as a violent,
misogynistic religion. Some have those concerns but are, or become,
more open to listening to what Rashed has to say in the course of the
dialogue. Some are thinking about converting to Islam. One person asks
how to be sure that the Quran is inspired, and another person wrestles
with whether to convert to Islam because she is homosexual. Another
person is going through the Quran and asks Rashed how Muslims interpret
and apply certain passages. For instance, Islam is against people
making money as a result of interest, so can Muslims own stocks or have a
savings account? Rashed discusses the variety of ways that Muslims
have dealt with this teaching.
Rashed argues against what he believes are mischaracterizations of
Islam, as he refers to the Quran, teachings attributed to Muhammad, and
secular historians. According to Rashed, authentic Islam opposes
racism, misogyny, and religious compulsion. Jihad occurs defensively or
to protect Muslims from persecution, and authentic Islam is against
taking the lives of civilians. Suicide, and thus suicide-bombing, is
condemned in authentic Islam. As far as Rashed is concerned, Muslims
who act contrary to these teachings are not acting according to
authentic Islam. Rashed also refers to Muslim authorities who have
condemned terrorist attacks.
The book is not a PC whitewash of Islam, though, for Rashed defends
aspects of Islam that might offend a number of modern Westerners. I
have encountered Muslims who see Judaism and Christianity as legitimate
paths to God, but Rashed appears to uphold the necessity of accepting
Muhammad’s message, which he believes corrects the inaccuracies that
have accumulated in Judaism and Christianity. Rashed states that Islam
opposes religious compulsion, but he defends sharia law, stating that
governments should reflect God’s law. He argues that such laws are
reasonable, however, as when he contends that the stoning of adulterers
is to be limited and should occur against adultery that is so flagrant
and public that it undermines public morality. Rashed also affirms that
Islam opposes homosexual sex.
Rashed’s responses are friendly, engaging, and informative. He links
to sites that provide more information, and he refers to resources that
are probably useful, such as a particular translation of the Quran that
offers ideas about the specific historical situation that each passage
was addressing. Rashed comes across as someone who is eager to engage
any question that people may ask. While he sometimes asks people where
they are on their religious journey with respect to Islam, he is eager
to address questions that are asked simply to gain information, apart
from any desire to convert.
In terms of critiques, while there were times when Rashed
specifically cited sources, there were also times when he did not
provide the citation. He just quoted the Prophet, without specifying
where one can find that quote. The book would also have been better had
it engaged more the traditional Islamic passages that critics of Islam
have cited in arguing that Islam is racist, misogynistic, and violent.
These passages have been cited by such critics of Islam as Robert
Spencer and Hank Hanegraaff. But even Mark Robert Anderson, author of The Quran in Context,
who has graduate degrees in Islamic studies from McGill University and
has studied and taught in Egypt and Jordan, argues that Muhammad’s wars
were not always defensive. Rashed may tangentially address such
concerns when he argues that not all Islamic laws are universal but that
some applied to specific situations, or when he acknowledges that Islam
engaged in the empire-building that others did. More engagement with
controversial passages would have enhanced the book, however; still, it
should be remembered that this is only the first book of a series.
I received a complimentary copy of this book from the author. My review is honest.