Monday, January 9, 2017

Book Write-Up: The Unseen Realm, by Michael S. Heiser

Michael S. Heiser.  The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible.  Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2015.  See here to purchase the book.

Michael S. Heiser has an M.A. in Ancient History (with a focus on ancient Israel and Egyptology) from the University of Pennsylvania, as well as a Ph.D. in Hebrew Bible and Semitic languages from the University of Wisconsin-Madison, which is an academic powerhouse in Hebrew Bible and Semitic studies.

To provide a rough summary of the story that Heiser tells, let’s start with Adam and Eve.  According to Heiser, God created Adam and Eve to reproduce and fill the earth with people made in God’s image, extending the influence of God throughout the world (Genesis 1:28).  The Garden of Eden, where Adam and Eve were to receive revelations from God, was the earthy location of the divine council, God’s council of divine beings that is mentioned in Scripture (i.e., Psalm 82; I Kings 22:19ff.).  In the ancient Near East, gods met or dwelt on mountains and in gardens, so Heiser believes that the Garden of Eden was a meeting place for the divine council.  Among the divine council was the serpent, who was part of the divine retinue, as serpents were in ancient Near Eastern imagery of gods, and perhaps also in Isaiah 6:2.  This serpent rebels against God and tempts Adam and Eve to sin, with the result that the serpent is cast to the underworld, as Heiser reads Genesis 2 in light of the rebellious beings in Isaiah 14 and Ezekiel 28.

Years later, after the Flood, human beings have failed to heed God’s desire for them to scatter throughout the earth and spread God’s influence.  They want to recapture the access to the divine council that Adam and Eve had, so they attempt to build a tower to the heavens, the Tower of Babel (Genesis 11).  God scatters the people over the face of the earth by confusing their languages.  As God divides up the nations, God assigns each nation to a particular god, who would rule the nation (Deuteronomy 4:19-20; 32:8-9).  Israel, however, would belong to God God-self.  Other gods try to thwart God’s plan to rule Israel and, in turn, to spread God’s influence throughout the world through Israel.  As they did prior to the Flood (Genesis 6), the gods mate with human beings and produce giant offspring, and this offspring inhabits the Promised Land, where God intends the Israelites to dwell.  The Israelite Conquest of the Promised Land is about ridding the land of this giant offspring, even though Heiser states that there were many Canaanites who were not giants.

For Heiser, the work of Jesus was about freeing the nations from the rule of the gods, so that God and exalted believers would rule the nations instead.  The gods are not eager to relinquish their reign, however, and that is why Christians are in a battle against principalities and powers (Ephesians 6:12).  The Kingdom of God is already and not yet.

This is the overall picture that Heiser presents, but there are other arguments that Heiser makes, as well.  Like a number of Christians, Heiser contends that there are two YHWHs in the Old Testament, one of them being a YHWH who appears to people in a visible form.  For Heiser, that particular YHWH is Jesus Christ.  Heiser states that, “in some of the oldest manuscripts of Jude (e.g., Alexandrinus and Vaticanus),” Jude 5 states that Jesus led the Israelites out of Egypt at the Exodus (page 270).

Another prominent topic in this book is Bashan and Mount Hermon, in the north.  Both were part of Og’s dominion.  Og was one of the Rephaim, an offspring of a divine-human union (Deuteronomy 3:13; Joshua 12:5).  For Heiser, Bashan was a spiritually evil place.  Heiser regards it as a gate to hell, since Ugaritic literature presents Rephaim in the underworld, plus Bashan can mean serpent, and the serpent of Genesis 3 was in the underworld.  I Enoch 6:1-6 states that Mount Hermon was where the divine beings of Genesis 6 came when they cohabited with women, producing the giant Nephilim.  In Jesus’ time, Mount Hermon was a prominent site of pagan temples, and Heiser argues that Jesus is alluding to it when he states, near that very site, that the gates of hell will not prevail against the church (Matthew 16:18).  Bashan appears in the context of Scriptural passages that the New Testament quotes (Psalm 22; Psalm 68), and Heiser deems that to be significant.  Heiser also maintains that Bashan has eschatological significance, as he interprets eschatological danger from the north in reference to the evil spiritual forces of Bashan.  Most interestingly, Heiser speculates that the maligned cows of Bashan in Amos 4:1-2 are not rich women but rather supernatural beings!

Other fascinating topics that Heiser explores: the question of whether the “god of this age” who blinds people in II Corinthians 4:4 is Satan or God; the identity of Armageddon (for Heiser, it is not Megiddo!); why Paul wanted to go to Spain (Romans 15:24, 28), and how Isaiah 66:19 relates to that; themes from the Hebrew Bible that appear in the story of Pentecost (Acts 2); and how the Old Testament foreshadows (and does not foreshadow) Jesus.  And there are many more topics that Heiser discusses, not only in the text but also in the in-depth footnotes.

Here are some thoughts:

A.  I am slightly unclear about where Heiser believes the demons/gods, specifically the demons/gods who ruled the nations, came to be located.  Obviously, these gods started out in heaven, but does Heiser believe that the gods who rule the nations were cast from heaven into hell?  Heiser believes that there are evil spirits in hell: the serpent, and the spirits of the giants.  But what about the gods who rule the nations?  My impression was that, sometimes in this book, these evil spirits got conflated, and that was where my confusion arose.

B.  There may be something to Heiser’s arguments about Bashan, in terms of Bashan being considered an evil place by ancient Israelites and later Jews.  I am not entirely convinced by Heiser’s argument that Bashan was considered a gateway to the underworld, however.  When Deuteronomy refers to Rephaim in Bashan, it may simply mean that there were giants who at one time lived in the land of Bashan, on earth, not that Bashan was a gateway to the Rephaim in hell.

C.  Heiser addressed questions that I have had.  For example, why would the ancients believe that gods dwelt on mountains, if they could simply climb the mountains and see that the gods were not there?  Why would God tell Adam and Eve to fill the earth in Genesis 1, when Genesis 2 seems to presume that, had they not sinned, they would have stayed in the Garden of Eden rather than filling the earth?  Heiser’s answers generate more questions in my head, but he did well to address them.

D.  I am not saying this to be a heresy-hunter, but Heiser’s view on the divine inspiration and historicity of the Bible was rather unclear to me.  Heiser seemed to argue that the divine-human unions in Genesis 6 and the Tower of Babel story in Genesis 11 were Jewish responses to Babylonian or Mesopotamian claims.  Does that imply that they were stories created during the exilic period and did not actually happen in history?  Heiser also appears to argue that the Bible reflects some of the limitations in knowledge of its time: for instance, Isaiah 66:19’s reference to Tarshish and Paul’s desire to go to Spain reflect ancient ideas about the extent of the earth.  Would Heiser treat this as an example of divine accommodation?

E.  Although my point in (D.) may portray Heiser as somewhat of a liberal, there were salient conservative elements in Heiser’s treatment of the Bible.  Source criticism was lacking in the book, as if the Bible reflected one divine authorial intent.  Heiser attempted to harmonize apparent contradictions (i.e., statements that appear to suggest that there are no other gods besides YHWH, and statements that acknowledge the existence of other gods).  Isaiah 53 is applied to the Davidic king, without much argument (page 247).  The Gospel of Mark is presumed to see Jesus as God-incarnate, when there are many scholars who disagree.  Source criticism could have an impact on Heiser’s argument: is the Bible’s message, for example, that humans and Israel are to fill the world with God’s influence, when there are some exclusivist voices in the Hebrew Bible?  I doubt, though, that source criticism would overthrow every argument that Heiser makes.  Heiser’s approach may be a reasonable canonical way to approach the text, as Heiser implies when he refers to the divine inspiration of the text’s final form.  Plus, there is a possibility that New Testament authors and figures were influenced by the Old Testament themes in the manner that Heiser discusses.

F.  Heiser does well to refer to scholarly literature about Jewish binitarianism.  I question, though, whether Heiser’s interpretation of the Angel of the Lord is the only way to account for that figure.  Is the Angel of the Lord a second YHWH, co-eternal with the other YHWH, or is he simply a created being acting as God’s representative, carrying divine privileges and authority as God’s representative?  The view that a created being could represent God and carry divine prerogatives was present in ancient Judaism, as J.R. Daniel Kirk demonstrates in his book, A Man Attested by God (Eerdmans, 2016).

My questions notwithstanding, I found The Unseen Realm to be an interesting, engaging, and well-argued book.

I received a complimentary copy of this book from the publisher.  My review is honest!

3 comments:

  1. I am in the process of reading this book. I find it fascinating. Some of it is a bit over my head but what I can understand is interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It is a fascinating book! You may already know this, but Heiser also wrote a book called Supernatural, which has the same message as The Unseen Realm but is easier to follow. And Douglas Dorn has a small book, The Unseen Realm: Q&A Companion which synthesizes what Heiser says and provides the Scripture references. I'm reading that right now. I like Heiser's Unseen Realm better, on account of the depth, the arguments, and the tangents, but reading Van Dorn's book is helping me to understand better Heiser's arguments.

    ReplyDelete

Search This Blog

Loading...