Caryn A. Reeder.  The Enemy in the Household: Family Violence in Deuteronomy and Beyond.  Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2012.  See here for Baker’s page about it.
The Torah appears to recommend and to approve of family violence, and
 this is disturbing to a number of modern readers, especially those who 
would like to take the Torah seriously as a document of religious 
value.  There is the command that parents participate in the execution 
of their rebellious son (Deuteronomy 21:18-21), the law in Deuteronomy 
22 about the stoning of the wife who was not a virgin when she got 
married, and the command for Israelites to kill any close family member 
who recommends the worship of other gods (Deuteronomy 13:6-11).  
Deuteronomy 33:9 praises the Levites for rejecting their close family 
members in their loyalty to God’s covenant, and that may be a reference 
to the story in Exodus 32 about the Levites slaughtering brothers who 
worshiped the Golden Calf.
Caryn Reeder’s The Enemy in the Household is about family 
violence in Deuteronomy, as well as the interaction with this concept 
within Second Temple Judaism (i.e., Jubilees, Philo, and Josephus), 
rabbinic literature, and the New Testament.  Her treatment of the Hebrew
 Bible employs a hermeneutic of trust, in which she tries to give 
biblical writers the benefit of the doubt and see even their troubling 
texts as religiously and morally instructive.  She looks for the 
reasoning behind the laws about family violence, as she interacts with 
biblical scholarship, and she believes that they are about protecting 
Israel from violating her covenant with God, safeguarding inheritance 
(in the case of the man who wants to marry a virgin because then he can 
be sure that it will be his children who will inherit his property), and
 maintaining societal order.  Reeder maintains that the value that these
 laws place on community can be instructive to those today who are 
extremely individualistic.
Reeder interacts with the history of interpretation of these laws in 
order to demonstrate that ancient interpreters, too, struggled with 
them.  Moreover, Reeder explores the other side of the concept of family
 violence within the Bible, since Jewish Christians according to the 
synoptic Gospels were actually the victims of family violence, 
as their families rejected them and even sought their death on account 
of the Jewish Christians’ commitment to Jesus.
Reeder’s discussion of the Hebrew Bible was informative and 
judicious, albeit repetitive.  While she does well to seek reasons for 
Deuteronomy’s laws regarding family violence, one can legitimately 
question whether she successfully defends them.  Do any 
reasons—-covenant or inheritance—-justify becoming so cold as to 
participate in the death of a close family member?  Could the same 
objectives have been accomplished in any other way?
Reeder’s interaction with the New Testament addressed such issues as 
the Jewish Christians as victims of family violence as well as the New 
Testament’s attempts to protect churches from false teachers, which is 
similar to the goal of Deuteronomy 13:6-11 (to protect Israel from 
apostate family members), only without the violence.  This discussion, 
too, was informative and judicious, but it would have benefited from a 
discussion of why the early Jewish Christians were persecuted: What 
specifically about their commitment to Jesus made them subject to family
 violence, especially the sort of family violence that was directed 
against apostates?
The most valuable part of this book, in my opinion, was Reeder’s 
discussion of Second Temple and rabbinic literature.  Reeder addresses 
the extent to which Jewish interpreters upheld family violence, as well 
as the extent to which they mitigated, softened, or limited it.  One 
point that stood out to me was her argument that the Book of Jubilees 
largely rejected family violence as a solution to religious apostasy, 
which was significant within its historical context, as devout Jews 
struggled with the ramifications of Hellenistic influence.  Another 
interesting detail in Reeder’s book was her discussion of the 
interrelationship between Second Temple interaction with the concept of 
family violence and the Roman idea that a father was lord of his family 
and could kill his children at will.  Reeder talks about the Romans’ own
 limitations on this idea, as well as Jewish criticism of it.
The Enemy in the Household is a useful work on family violence in the Book of Deuteronomy and the history of biblical interpretation.
My thanks to Baker Academic for sending me a complimentary copy of this book, in exchange for an honest review.
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
