On page 166 of Nixon: Ruin and Recovery, 1973-1990, Stephen
Ambrose says that Richard Nixon "liked Israel because of its underdog
status and 'screw you' attitude toward the rest of the world." Yet, on
the very next page, Ambrose quotes Nixon saying that "The time has come
to quit pandering to Israel's intransigent position." Moreover, in two
books by Nixon about foreign policy that I read, Nixon appeared to be
rather balanced on the issue of Israel and the Palestinians. What this
teaches me is that it's possible for one to have a gut-level,
reactionary feeling, along with a more reasonable stance.
We see
this sort of thing with Nixon on other issues. Nixon liked
Vice-President Spiro Agnew's bold rhetoric, yet Nixon didn't always
think that Agnew's approach was politically prudent. In volume 2 of
Ambrose's trilogy, Ambrose narrates that Nixon sometimes had a "Off with
their heads" approach to government, as he demanded mass firings. But
Nixon's aide H.R. Haldeman would do nothing in terms of carrying out
Nixon's orders for firings, and Nixon would cool off.
I have
reactionary, gut-level feelings, and I have the thoughts that I can back
up by reason. There are many times when I would like to vent on this
blog with my reactionary, gut-level feelings. But I rarely do so, at
least not nowadays. That may be good, or that may be bad, in terms of
this blog. It's good because I don't come across as an ignoramous.
It's bad because many people like to read bloggers who shoot from the
hip and generate controversy.