I have two items for my write-up today on volume 2 of Richard Nixon's memoirs.
1.
Nixon talks about the energy crisis. In the spring of 1973, the king
of Saudi Arabia declared that the Saudis would reduce the amount of oil
that it sent to the United States, unless the U.S. reversed its
pro-Israel policies. Nixon denied that he was pro-Israel or pro-Arab,
affirming that he was for peace in the Middle East. But an embargo
still came!
What was Nixon's response to this? Essentially,
Nixon's goal was to reduce American energy consumption, but also to
encourage the expansion of the production of domestic oil and natural
gas. Nixon also supported clean coal, for he wanted energy that did not
pollute. Nixon opposed rationing gasoline because he feared this would
create a bureaucracy as well as a black market. Meanwhile,
Henry Kissinger was talking with the king of Saudi Arabia and also
President Anwar Sadat of Egypt. (And it's interesting that Kissinger
was the one doing this, since Nixon says in volume 1 that he delegated
the Middle East to Secretary of State William Rogers, for Nixon feared
that Kissinger would not be the right guy to build bridges with the
Arabs on account of Kissinger's Jewish background. Moreover, Kissinger
in volume 1 strikes me as very pro-Israel. In volume 2, however,
Kissinger is involved in Middle Eastern policy, as he negotiates
agreements between Israel and Arabs and has discussions with Arab
leaders.)
Nixon narrates that he had some successes in
terms of getting his agenda passed. He signed an Alaska pipeline bill
into law, and the U.S. was reducing its energy consumption. But Nixon
says that a lot of his agenda did not get passed. Later during Nixon's
Presidency, "seven of the nine Arab states finally agreed to lift the
oil embargo" (page 560).
Nixon's energy policy had
elements that would appeal to liberals (i.e., conservation), but also to
conservatives (i.e., increased exploration and production in domestic
energy and the relaxation of regulations). My question is this: If the
energy crisis ended under Nixon, why was it an issue under President
Jimmy Carter?
2. On pages 562-563, Nixon complains about
the House committee that was to inquire into his impeachment. Nixon
points to indications that members of the committee were actively
rooting for his impeachment, through words, bumper stickers, etc. Nixon
did not expect for them to be fair or impartial. One name that I
recognized was that of Charles Rangle, who called Nixon a criminal.
Rangle was (and still is) a Congressman, and he has run into his own
scandals (see here).
Nixon
in volume 2 often presents the investigations into the Watergate
scandal as a witch-hunt. In Nixon's account, investigators ignored when
Democrats committed misdeeds, while jumping on him and his
Administration; the press was hostile to him, not to mention inaccurate;
there were few Republicans on a particular committee, and thus they
lacked the resources to do the research that might add balance to the
one-sided witch-hunt; etc. The thing is, Nixon occasionally depicts
Senator Sam Ervin and others Nixon criticizes as being fair, primarily
when they dismiss (in an informal sense) certain accusations against
Nixon. By appealing to his opponents, Nixon is probably hoping to
present the accusations as ridiculous!