I started Pat Buchanan's The Great Betrayal: How American Sovereignty and Social Justice Are Being Sacrificed to the Gods of the Global Economy.
Buchanan
 begins his book with a story about a lady who worked at a Fruit of the 
Loom plant and helped to support her family with the money that she 
earned from that job, but then the plant closed down.  Buchanan then 
went on to cite statistics about the decline in real family income, the 
increase in the share of wealth that is held by the top 1 per cent of 
families, the drop in the percentage of Americans who work in 
manufacturing, and the increase in the number of people who work at 
Wal-Mart.  This all is in a chapter entitled "The Two Americas", which 
would later become a phrase that Democratic Presidential candidate John 
Edwards used when talking about poverty.  And Buchanan wrote about the 
top 1 percent a little over a decade before the Occupy Movement, which 
often refers to the top 1 percent.
Buchanan confessed that he used
 to be a free-trader, even when Democrats (such as John F. Kennedy) were
 the ones peddling it, but some in his family confronted him about his 
position because they saw the devastation that free trade was wrecking 
on communities----as companies had to close down due to their inability 
to compete.  Now, as Buchanan looks back on the free trade policies of 
the 1950's-1960's, he questions their rationale.  The Eisenhower 
Administration, for example, heralded free trade as a way to gain allies
 in the Cold War against Communism, but Buchanan does not think that 
free trade was even necessary to get countries as allies: after all, 
many of these countries were already afraid of Communism, and so they 
were already with us!
In terms of the historical narrative that 
Buchanan tells, much of it overlaps with what I read in Edward Gresser's
 pro-free trade book, Freedom from Want.  Buchanan, like 
Gresser, talks about how Woodrow Wilson sought to reduce the tariff yet 
still wanted an active government, which required revenue, and so Wilson
 supported an income tax.  Buchanan also notes that Republicans for 
years tended to be the protectionist party, whereas Democrats leaned 
more towards free trade, a point that Gresser emphasizes in his attempt 
to portray free trade as a liberal virtue.  Buchanan, however, sees 
nothing virtuous about it, for not only does free trade undermine 
American companies, but it also challenges American sovereignty, which 
was why a number of Republicans in the late 1940's opposed the ITO, a 
body that decades later was resurrected as the WTO.
One difference
 between Buchanan and Gresser is that Buchanan calls Thomas Jefferson a 
protectionist, whereas Gresser quoted a statement by Jefferson that 
supported freer trade.  I'll see how Buchanan portrays Jefferson later 
in the book, but I wouldn't be surprised if Jefferson believed in trade 
yet did protectionist things.  Jefferson had strong ideological beliefs,
 yet he could be pragmatic.  As President, he gave a green light to the 
Louisiana Purchase, for example, even though he initially thought that 
he needed to jump through hoops for that to take place.
 
 
 Posts
Posts
 
 
 
